Are we need a gothic English keyboard layout?

Hi-Angel hiangel999 at gmail.com
Tue Aug 26 20:45:54 PDT 2014 

 Officially it is called Β«Bold fraktur lettersΒ», position in Unicode
U1D56C-U1D59F (𝕴𝖋 π–žπ–”π–š 𝖉𝖔𝖓'𝖙 π–˜π–Šπ–Š π–™π–π–Š π–•π–π–—π–†π–˜π–Š π–Žπ–“ π–™π–π–Š
π–‡π–—π–†π–ˆπ–Šπ–˜ π–™π–π–Šπ–“ π–žπ–”π–š'π–—π–Š π–˜π–ˆπ–—π–Šπ–œπ–Šπ–‰ β€” π–™π–π–Žπ–˜ π–‘π–Šπ–™π–™π–Šπ–—π–˜
π–Žπ–“ π–™π–π–Š π–˜π–™π–†π–“π–‰π–†π–—π–™ π–˜π–Žπ–“π–ˆπ–Š 2001 π–žπ–Šπ–†π–—). Right now I made it
up from one of an unused by me layouts of the Β«/usr/share/X11/xkb/symbols/Β»
directory. But I think I could dig into it, and make a full keyboard layout
if there is a chance that you're accept it.
 So, the question is: are you need this layout? Personally I think that it
looks very beautiful, and since all over the internet using the Unicode, no
would be a problems with a symbols encoding. I think we need it.

 P.S. There is also non-bold characters which probably would be more
comfortable for a layout, but alas, if the Wikipedia is right
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mathematical_operators_and_symbols_in_Unicode
some characters there is missing by the standart, so we have only the bold
alphabet.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg/attachments/20140827/c4a365bf/attachment.html>

More information about the xorg mailing list