Latest Xgl code
David Reveman
davidr at novell.com
Mon Jan 2 16:46:25 PST 2006
On Tue, 2006-01-03 at 09:50 +1100, Dave Airlie wrote:
> On 1/3/06, David Reveman <davidr at novell.com> wrote:
> > On Mon, 2006-01-02 at 17:28 +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jan 02, 2006 at 11:17:39AM +0100, David Reveman wrote:
> > > > I'd like to get this code into freedesktop CVS asap. I suggest that we
> > > > put it in a xgl module for now as I'm guessing that it'll take some time
> > > > before everything can be merged into Xorg and I don't want to spend any
> > > > time merging the code back into the kdrive tree.
> > >
> > > This sounds rather horrible. Dave and Eric have done some nice work in
> > > the public, so you as the person who refused to work in the public
> > > should merged into that, after approval of the other developers.
> >
> > As far as I can tell it seams that they've pretty much only done work on
> > the egl specific code which I haven't worked on so that's going to be
> > really easy to merge. Other than simple updates for tracking the changes
> > I've made to glitz most of the code that have gone into CVS recently is
> > just code from one of my old snapshots that I put in public_html on
> > freedesktop.org a long time ago.
> >
> > If there's something else than the egl specific code in the CVS tree
> > that's working better than my latest code, then I'm all for doing the
> > work to get that merged but my understanding is that this isn't the
> > case. Correct me if I'm wrong.
> >
>
> The main reason I'd like to merge your current tree back into kdrive
> tree is for two reasons
> 1) we've got too many trees already,
> 2) merging into trees gives us a better idea when changes bust
> something badly, I've already re-written the configure.ac to still
> allow kdrive to be useful...
If most people like this better that's fine with me. I'll help out as
much as I can.
>
> I'm quite willing to import this code drop into the kdrive CVS, the
> biggest blocker into getting it working in Xorg CVS will be the GLX
> changes, I'm not sure how these are going to impact the Xorg server
> and I get a feeling we will need to do put some thought into the best
> way to get this working across the supported platforms....
Yes, the GLX changes will need most work.
>
> I'll handle the merging back over the next few evenings if everyone
> agrees, the biggest thing that we can do is try to avoid any more code
> drops from this one, and try to get patches since this baseline for
> future submissions, doing tree diffs between CVS and these trees is
> quite messy (parallel changes in kdrive fb code...)
I agree. I'll probably have a few updates in the next couple of days to
the code drop I did today but I'll provide these as patches.
-David
More information about the xorg
mailing list