[Xorg] Xevie addition to libXext
Keith Packard
keithp at keithp.com
Sun Aug 1 15:53:22 PDT 2004
Around 8 o'clock on Aug 1, Stuart Kreitman wrote:
> just a packaging issue. I was operating under the impression that Xext
> was a general purpose place to put small extensions,
Yes, a tradition started before systems generally had shared libaries
though. I think it's a bad plan, although it's probably at least partially
my fault.
> We should start a writeup on packaging extensions. Does something like
> that already exist?
I think the modular tree has a reasonably clear structure for extensions
and I've been following that for the last several I've done:
FooExt/ - headers and specs (no Xlib dependency allowed)
foo.h - constants needed by server, library and apps
fooproto.h - protocol structures need by server and library
foo.pc - pkg-config file
Xfoo/ - C library (including library headers)
Xfoo.h - library header
libXfoo.so - shared library
xfoo.pc - pkg-config file
server/foo - X server implementation
One trick is to make sure foo.h and fooproto.h headers don't depend at all
on Xlib, and to make sure apps needn't use fooproto.h.
-keith
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 228 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg/attachments/20040801/1fad15a5/attachment.pgp>
More information about the xorg
mailing list