kdrive and xgl DDXes

[Daniel Stone]

On Thu, Jun 23, 2005 at 08:06:09AM -0700, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
> Adam Jackson wrote:
> >How do people feel about including the kdrive and xgl DDXes in 7.0?
> >
> >I'd really like to see them included in 7.0, but that may not reflect the 
> >distributor perspective.  Comments?
> 
> Can they be done as separate modules that just happen to be released at
> the same time as 7.0, work with 7.0, but aren't officially blessed as
> a formal part of the 7.0 release?   (At one point we discussed having
> a "contrib" release or set of modules for things that weren't formally
> part of the release but could be used with it.)

With m12n, don't contrib modules become irrelevant?  Either something's
part of the release, or it's not, in which case putting it somewhere
else doesn't really buy you much.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-modular/attachments/20050624/f519cb3f/attachment.pgp