kdrive and xgl DDXes

[Keith Packard]

On Wed, 2005-06-22 at 12:19 -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
> How do people feel about including the kdrive and xgl DDXes in 7.0?

I think it's a bad idea.  7.0 and 6.9 should be the same, and we
certainly shouldn't include kdrive in 6.9.

> 
> Arguments for:
> 
> - Stable version number on kdrive and xgl releases is a good thing
> - kdrive has precedent for being included in releases from XFree86
> - xgl really needs a release at some point

We can do a kdrive release which is separate from X.org; it's pretty
trivial once you have the 7.0 .pc files for the necessary libaries to
just 'make distcheck' and ship it.

-keith

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-modular/attachments/20050622/428aec18/attachment.pgp