kdrive and xgl DDXes

[Adam Jackson]

On Wednesday 22 June 2005 12:56, Keith Packard wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-06-22 at 12:19 -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
> > Arguments for:
> >
> > - Stable version number on kdrive and xgl releases is a good thing
> > - kdrive has precedent for being included in releases from XFree86
> > - xgl really needs a release at some point
>
> We can do a kdrive release which is separate from X.org; it's pretty
> trivial once you have the 7.0 .pc files for the necessary libaries to
> just 'make distcheck' and ship it.

Fair enough.  Are we planning to move kdrive and xgl into the same CVS module 
as the other DDXes at some point?

- ajax
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-modular/attachments/20050622/d8c0a214/attachment-0001.pgp