server-1.12-branch

[Jeremy Huddleston]

id rather have a single 100% automated commit followed by 1 or more cleanups.  Could we do this simultaneously on all the stable branches that people care about (1.10+ I think), so cherry-picks are less painful?

Sent from my iPhone...

On Mar 13, 2012, at 15:56, Daniel Stone <daniel at fooishbar.org> wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> On 9 March 2012 22:47, Keith Packard <keithp at keithp.com> wrote:
>> On Fri, 09 Mar 2012 12:56:52 -0800, Alan Coopersmith <alan.coopersmith at oracle.com> wrote:
>>> Are you going to pull in Daniel's code style change now?   Of all the -next
>>> candidates from the last few months, that was the biggest I remember.
>> 
>> Yes, that needs to happen now or not at all. It will make back-porting
>> fixes painful for a while, but the alternative is to forever live with
>> the existing mish-mash of coding styles.
>> 
>> Daniel: do you want to re-spin the patch for 1.12 now? iirc, it was just
>> a purely mechanical operation, right?
> 
> I've revived this and put the result (for now) into
> people.fd.o/~daniels/xserver:coding-style, but indent is prone to
> doing some moderately insane things, so I've been going through the
> results one-by-one (ugh) over the past couple of nights and fixing up
> what's broken.  If time is of the essence I could push this now and
> then push series of smaller fixup commits later.
> 
>> The testing I did last time was to compare the emitted instruction
>> sequences for every file compiled for my environment.
> 
> Ooh right, I'll do that too.  Have you got the exact commands you used?
> 
> Cheers,
> Daniel
>