[PATCH] mi: Hush extension initialization (#75870)

[Daniel Stone]

Hi,

On 27 March 2014 15:48, Adam Jackson <ajax at redhat.com> wrote:
> Printing these as ErrorF is fairly obnoxious, since it means the
> non-hardware servers now spew stuff to the console for entirely routine
> events.  And actually, printing these at all is fairly obnoxious, since
> a) we're printing a line for every extension, whether it's enabled or
> not, and b) we're not actually initializing the extension at this point.
>
> Signed-off-by: Adam Jackson <ajax at redhat.com>

In hindsight, not 100% sure what I was thinking.  (Aside from not
thinking, since it was just a mechanical conversion from xf86.)

Reviewed-by: Daniel Stone <daniel at fooishbar.org>

Cheers,
Daniel