newbie resource temporarily unavailable
walter harms
wharms at bfs.de
Sun Jul 1 01:54:20 PDT 2012
Am 30.06.2012 15:31, schrieb Glynn Clements:
>
> Alan Corey wrote:
>
>> Well, you see, I just really dislike C++. I've tried on and off for
>> years and I just can't get it through my head. I want a toolkit I can
>> program in C. FLTK seems great, same with GTK, but not without C++.
>> I'm familiar with OO programming concepts from Java, Delphi and Perl
>> but C++? Uh-uh.
>
> I would have thought that GTK would fit the bill.
>
>>> I wouldn't advise putting too much effort into Xt/Xaw stuff; they've
>>> fallen so far into disuse that if X.org shipped a totally
>>> non-functional version of one of those libraries, it might take a year
>>> before anyone actually noticed.
>>
>> Wouldn't that break a bunch of things that rely on them?
>
> Such as? The typical Linux desktop environment doesn't have any
> Xt-based applications; Gnome uses GTK and KDE uses Qt.
>
> Okay, Xt isn't quite dead yet (e.g. XEmacs (which I'm using at this
> moment) requires it), but it's quite definitely "legacy" at this
> point.
>
FYI
perhaps this is correct for desktop but there are several applications
in the wild that are used regular that require Xt.
re,
wh
More information about the xorg
mailing list