Intel Graphics package and patch requirments

[Jin, Gordon]

Vasily Khoruzhick wrote on Saturday, January 31, 2009 10:55 PM:
> On Saturday 31 January 2009 16:38:09 you wrote:
> 
>> It's not surprising that uxa is not stable in 2.6.0 -- it's not the
>> default setting. (we hope uxa would be stabilized in next release)
>> 
>> But did you file bugs for your uxa issues? I only see you've filed
>> bug#19738 for the exa performance issue.
> 
> Nope, uxa issues for gma950 was fixed in 2.6.1. Bug #19738 is about
> dri2 3D performance, not about EXA.

Ah, yes, that bug is about uxa. I just saw you mentioned "with exa it's slow in 3D" in your email.
 
> Btw, with EXA and kernel >= 2.6.28 I can't get 3D working. glxinfo
> says that I'm using direct rendering, but ~9fps in quake3 is not
> hardware accelerated 3D, is it?

Maybe you could file a bug with glxinfo output attached.

Thanks
Gordon