Intel Graphics package and patch requirments

[Vasily Khoruzhick]

On Saturday 31 January 2009 16:38:09 you wrote:

> It's not surprising that uxa is not stable in 2.6.0 -- it's not the default
> setting. (we hope uxa would be stabilized in next release)
>
> But did you file bugs for your uxa issues? I only see you've filed
> bug#19738 for the exa performance issue.

Nope, uxa issues for gma950 was fixed in 2.6.1. Bug #19738 is about dri2 3D 
performance, not about EXA.

Btw, with EXA and kernel >= 2.6.28 I can't get 3D working. glxinfo says that 
I'm using direct rendering, but ~9fps in quake3 is not hardware accelerated 
3D, is it?

> > and 3D is still unstable in 2.6.1/git master (I still get xserver
> > hang - image just freezes - after playing a while in any 3D game).
>
> I didn't see this issue. Could you file a bug, according to
> http://www.intellinuxgraphics.org/how_to_report_bug.html?

Can't reproduce it with xf86-video-intel-2.6.1 and latest mesa (I seems latest 
mesa update fixed it)

> Thanks for your testing.

Thanks for your work ;) 
>
> Gordon

Regards
Vasily