very slow performance of glxgears (68 fps)
mhopf at suse.de
Thu Feb 5 09:03:14 PST 2009
On Jan 30, 09 18:11:57 -0800, Bryce Harrington wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 01:29:49PM -0800, Eric Anholt wrote:
> > > $ glxgears
> > > Failed to initialize TTM buffer manager. Falling back to classic.
> > > 300 frames in 5.0 seconds = 59.884 FPS
> > > 299 frames in 5.0 seconds = 59.621 FPS
> > > 300 frames in 5.0 seconds = 59.818 FPS
> > glxgears is not a benchmark.
> > We sync to vblank because running glxgears at 1000fps is dumb.
> I am going to go out on a limb and guess we're going to see a crapload
> of reports of "performance regression" due to reduced glxgears frame
At openSUSE we print out a warning now (well, this change went into
*after* 11.1, unfortunately), that this is not a benchmark. We got really
tired of these statements.
Matthias Hopf <mhopf at suse.de> __ __ __
Maxfeldstr. 5 / 90409 Nuernberg (_ | | (_ |__ mat at mshopf.de
Phone +49-911-74053-715 __) |_| __) |__ R & D www.mshopf.de
More information about the xorg