interpreting glxinfo's output

[Dan Nicholson]

On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 5:13 PM, andrew rader <andrew.r.rader at gmail.com> wrote:
> thanks for the fast reply,
>
>  that does indeed answer my question, with one additional question. The
>  last post has the general extension list described:
>
>  "general: and that's the resulting supported GLX extensions, depending
>  what the server and client sides support."
>
>  would it be better to just say "general is a list of the extensions
>  that the driver supports"? since both the client and server (in my
>  case) support TFP, but "general" doesn't, is it the driver that is
>  missing this extension?

Actually, it's all three (this just came up the other day): client and
server both handle the protocol and the driver implements it.

--
Dan