interpreting glxinfo's output
dbn.lists at gmail.com
Wed Mar 26 17:15:38 PDT 2008
On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 5:13 PM, andrew rader <andrew.r.rader at gmail.com> wrote:
> thanks for the fast reply,
> that does indeed answer my question, with one additional question. The
> last post has the general extension list described:
> "general: and that's the resulting supported GLX extensions, depending
> what the server and client sides support."
> would it be better to just say "general is a list of the extensions
> that the driver supports"? since both the client and server (in my
> case) support TFP, but "general" doesn't, is it the driver that is
> missing this extension?
Actually, it's all three (this just came up the other day): client and
server both handle the protocol and the driver implements it.
More information about the xorg