wrong dpi after update
Felix Miata
mrmazda at ij.net
Wed Jan 2 14:12:14 PST 2008
On 2008/01/02 22:23 (GMT+0100) Bernd Schubert apparently typed:
> Alex Deucher wrote:
>> Both numbers are coming from the edid. We use the size from the
>> detailed timing block (367 x 275 mm).
> So my monitor provides 2 different edid information and unfortunately the
> wrong one is used? Well, I guess I can't modify the firmware of my
> display :(
> Also, I think randr for some reason seems to overwrite given xorg.conf
> display sizes
Is 'DisplaySize 410 310' what's in it?
> after xf86InitialConfiguration
> (**) RADEON(0): Display dimensions: (410, 310) mm
> (**) RADEON(0): DPI set to (99, 98)
> And then later on
> (II) GLX: Initialized DRI GL provider for screen 0
> (II) RADEON(0): Setting screen physical size to 367 x 275
> I think the first is taken from my xorg.conf display section. Bug or
> feature?
Maybe an approach similar to
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=331609#c17 and following will get
you going until such time as the current versions of xrandr, xorg & video
drivers are actually ready for use by mere mortal users.
--
"In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was
with God, and the Word was God." John 1:1 NIV
Team OS/2 ** Reg. Linux User #211409
Felix Miata *** http://mrmazda.no-ip.com/
More information about the xorg
mailing list