Maximum Screen Size for intel driver
Paul Menzel
paulepanter at users.sourceforge.net
Sat Dec 20 13:11:42 PST 2008
Dear Greg,
Am Samstag, den 20.12.2008, 20:38 +0000 schrieb Greg Stark:
>
>
> On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 6:58 PM, Greg Stark <gsstark at mit.edu> wrote:
> I'm running into this intel driver limit on a i945GM card:
>
> xrandr: screen cannot be larger than 1280x1824 (desired size
> 1920x1824)
>
> I've recompiled from source from
> git://anongit.freedesktop.org/git/xorg/driver/xf86-video-intel
> but it seems at
> least the master branch still has this problem. Are there
> plans to work around
> this problem? Is there a branch containing fixes for it?
>
> I know it's possible because in Windows this card happily
> drives this monitor
> at 1920x1200 for a total desktop size of 3200x1200.
>
>
> I'm not sure if this is related but I see the following code in
> i830_driver.c:
>
> /* See i830_exa.c comments for why we limit the framebuffer size
> like this.
> */
> if (IS_I965G(pI830)) {
> max_width = 8192;
> max_height = 8192;
> } else {
> max_width = 2048;
> max_height = 2048;
> }
> xf86CrtcSetSizeRange (pScrn, 320, 200, max_width, max_height);
>
> There is no such related comments in i830_exa.c as the comment here
> claims. (In fact there are hardly any comments in i830_exa.c at all).
> Is this code just obsolete? What will happen if I just put a more
> reasonable set of values here?
I heard, there are some technical limitations to it in the
implementation.
I think [1] is the way to go. (Look for Virtual.)
Thanks,
Paul
[1] http://wiki.debian.org/DebianEeePC/HowTo/Configure#head-5002c433e6ebf8a0a8fae6ae545cc32789bdae3f
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
URL: <http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg/attachments/20081220/3f4eb393/attachment.pgp>
More information about the xorg
mailing list