[RFC] RandR 1.3 properties, version 2

[Matthias Hopf]

On Dec 18, 08 18:34:26 +1100, Graeme Gill wrote:
> Matthias Hopf wrote:
> > AFAIR we agreed on that this property name can just be changed without
> > breaking backward compatibility, because it was never agreed upon that
> > this was a standard so far.
> 
> I guess I can always add yet another EDID atom string check
> to my display color profile management code, but is there a
> reason to change it ?

It conforms to the standard naming scheme we AFAIU agreed on on the
mailing list.

I'd have no issues with adding a non-advocated EDID_DATA again to the
server, if that sounds fit reasonable. Keith?

Matthias

-- 
Matthias Hopf <mhopf at suse.de>      __        __   __
Maxfeldstr. 5 / 90409 Nuernberg   (_   | |  (_   |__          mat at mshopf.de
Phone +49-911-74053-715           __)  |_|  __)  |__  R & D   www.mshopf.de