[RFC] RandR 1.3 properties, version 2
graeme2 at argyllcms.com
Wed Dec 17 23:34:26 PST 2008
Matthias Hopf wrote:
> AFAIR we agreed on that this property name can just be changed without
> breaking backward compatibility, because it was never agreed upon that
> this was a standard so far.
I guess I can always add yet another EDID atom string check
to my display color profile management code, but is there a
reason to change it ?
(I use the EDID in an attempt to uniquely associate a display color profile
with a display monitor instance, so that it's possible for the profile
to follow the display even when it's plugged into a different output,
or different monitors are being used at different times.)
More information about the xorg