[RFC] RandR 1.3 properties, version 2

[Graeme Gill]

Matthias Hopf wrote:
> AFAIR we agreed on that this property name can just be changed without
> breaking backward compatibility, because it was never agreed upon that
> this was a standard so far.

I guess I can always add yet another EDID atom string check
to my display color profile management code, but is there a
reason to change it ?

(I use the EDID in an attempt to uniquely associate a display color profile
  with a display monitor instance, so that it's possible for the profile
  to follow the display even when it's plugged into a different output,
  or different monitors are being used at different times.)

Graeme Gill.