Draft: License policy for contributors
dgerard at gmail.com
Tue Dec 2 11:35:54 PST 2008
2008/12/2 Daniel Stone <daniel at fooishbar.org>:
> On Tue, Dec 02, 2008 at 01:48:31PM -0500, Adam Jackson wrote:
>> I don't know what our documentation licensing stance is. MIT would keep
>> things simple, but I don't know if it's appropriate for docs.
> What're our options? GFDL is out as DFSG-incompatible.
GFDL is an unspeakable Cthulhu-grade horror if you go anywhere deeper
than the surface. It's amazing how little types of stuff it actually
makes sense from; no-one knows what the hell would happen in a serious
courtroom stoush given the already vast disparity between the letter
of the license and widespread practice.
Learn from Wikipedia's HORRIBLE, HORRIBLE MISTAKE. Don't go there.
Whatever you do.
More information about the xorg