Draft: License policy for contributors

[Daniel Stone]

Hi,

On Wed, Dec 03, 2008 at 06:28:17AM +1100, Daniel Stone wrote:
> Otherwise, looks good to me (though I've not got any to compare it
> against; maybe the ASF have something that's worth checking?), so
> S-o-b me.

Actually, for super arse-covering, we might just want to explicitly
state that nothing in this document is to be interpreted as an extra
grant or condition of license to any software: the license is as stated
in the file(s) or module(s), and not impacted by that document.

Thanks for doing this, too.

Cheers,
Daniel
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg/attachments/20081203/390071b5/attachment.pgp>