Matrox G550, dual head, 1680x1050

[Tilman Sauerbeck]

Hans-Jürgen Koch [2007-03-04 22:47]:
> @matroxfb developers: Thanks a lot, guys! Well done! Most people I asked about 
> having a dual-head framebuffer console at 1680x1050 thought it would be 
> impossible.
> 
> @mga xorg developers: Well... Can you tell me why the kernel guys can 
> initialize and use the second head and you can't? If you can give me hints 
> where in the source I can start to look for the bug, I'm willing to spend 
> some time there. Is there something I could try in my configuration?

matroxfb is much better organized wrt dual-head configurations. It also
has support for some hardware that xf86-video-mga doesn't support yet.
I'm working on that.

I think you might be hitting this bug:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9854

I just attached a temporary fix that you could try.

Regards,
Tilman

-- 
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg/attachments/20070305/b96df037/attachment.pgp>