Updating the wiki and other issues

[Olivier Galibert]

On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 05:51:35PM -0500, Jon Grosshart wrote:
> Hmmmm... We could split hairs on that one all day I'm afraid. It really
> needs to be listed in deprecated since there is no longer a driver tarball
> of that name. That's the foremost definition of deprecated. "no longer
> relevant"... We don't have a mkcfm tarball anymore either and that was
> properly documented in 7.2...

Well, the difference is between deprecated code and deprecated names.
And the deprecated directory is more for deprecated code...

  OG.