[Mesa3d-dev] Re: state of r200-copy-pixels patch for mesa ?

Brian Paul brian.paul at tungstengraphics.com
Wed May 24 06:42:35 PDT 2006


David Reveman wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-05-24 at 14:46 +0200, Hanno Böck wrote:
> 
>>Hi,
>>
>>A long while back, davidr posted a patch called r200-copy-pixels-1.patch 
>>together with the first big xgl update telling that this would be required 
>>for performant operation of xgl.
>>
>>This patch still applies to current mesa cvs. I wanted to ask if
>>a) it still makes sense to apply this patch?
>>b) if yes, this shouldn't be applied to upstream Mesa?
>>
>>Patch is here:
>>http://svn.hboeck.de/xgl-overlay/media-libs/mesa/files/r200-copy-pixels-1.patch
>>
> 
> 
> Patch doesn't make sense anymore. Xgl now uses GLX_MESA_copy_sub_buffer
> instead. Fast copy pixel performance is still useful but that patch is
> no good.

Do you mean "the patch is no good for Xgl"?  Or, "the patch is defective"?

If it's not defective, I'll check it in.

-Brian



More information about the xorg mailing list