state of r200-copy-pixels patch for mesa ?

[David Reveman]

On Wed, 2006-05-24 at 14:46 +0200, Hanno Böck wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> A long while back, davidr posted a patch called r200-copy-pixels-1.patch 
> together with the first big xgl update telling that this would be required 
> for performant operation of xgl.
> 
> This patch still applies to current mesa cvs. I wanted to ask if
> a) it still makes sense to apply this patch?
> b) if yes, this shouldn't be applied to upstream Mesa?
> 
> Patch is here:
> http://svn.hboeck.de/xgl-overlay/media-libs/mesa/files/r200-copy-pixels-1.patch
> 

Patch doesn't make sense anymore. Xgl now uses GLX_MESA_copy_sub_buffer
instead. Fast copy pixel performance is still useful but that patch is
no good.

-David