personal git trees on people instead of git?

[Daniel Stone]

On Thu, Jun 29, 2006 at 09:21:47PM -0700, Keith Packard wrote:
> Now that Daniel has NFS mounted the git repo from kemper to annarchy,
> I'd like to reconsider where we store personal git repositories.
> 
> Moving them from kemper(git) to annarchy(anongit,people) will allow
> people to manage repositories on their own using their shell account.
> With them on kemper, it's actually harder to create your own repo than
> commit on a branch in the central one. Ick.
> 
> With this change, I'd also like to push for a general policy that
> personal development be done in personal repositories. With git's
> ability to share files across repositories, this doesn't present any
> disk space concern. It also permits anyone with an account to publish
> changes for any fd.o project.
> 
> Does this seem sensible?

+1.  We can have separate gitwebs, and have:
git://anongit.freedesktop.org/git/{xorg,dbus,...}
versus:
git://people.freedesktop.org/git/users/{keithp,daniels,krh,...}

(Of course, anongit.fd.o/git/users/... will work, and conversely so will
 people.fd.o/git/xorg/..., but whatever.)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 191 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg/attachments/20060630/5a5db9d7/attachment.pgp>