personal git trees on people instead of git?

[Kristian Høgsberg]

On 6/30/06, Keith Packard <keithp at keithp.com> wrote:
> Now that Daniel has NFS mounted the git repo from kemper to annarchy,
> I'd like to reconsider where we store personal git repositories.
>
> Moving them from kemper(git) to annarchy(anongit,people) will allow
> people to manage repositories on their own using their shell account.
> With them on kemper, it's actually harder to create your own repo than
> commit on a branch in the central one. Ick.
>
> With this change, I'd also like to push for a general policy that
> personal development be done in personal repositories. With git's
> ability to share files across repositories, this doesn't present any
> disk space concern. It also permits anyone with an account to publish
> changes for any fd.o project.
>
> Does this seem sensible?

Sounds good to me - if anonymous git protocol and gitweb works on
people, this is a much better setup.

Kristian