AM_PRETTY_CMDS and unofficial macros? (was Re: [ANNOUNCE] libXmu 1.0.3)
Jeremy C. Reed
reed at reedmedia.net
Sat Dec 9 05:49:01 PST 2006
On Wed, 8 Nov 2006, Daniel Stone wrote:
> libXmu 1.0.3 has no changes from 1.0.2, it's just to clear the
> versioning confusion. Thanks to Tilman again for pointing this out.
Where did you get this AM_PRETTY_CMDS (pretty-cmds)?
It is not portable. Its use of "test" doesn't even work with test(1) from
coreutils. (And doesn't work with built-in "test" found in some shells.)
The bug is not in libXmu itself but in your released version of configure
and aclocal.m4 included in this tarball.
I emailed the fix upstream to
http://kim.tensta.gannert.se/projects/pretty-am/
As far as I can find, I don't see this macro included with xorg nor with
official release of automake-1.9.6.
Which makes me wonder ... should official xorg releases be using
unofficial macros?
If this official, please point me to it and I will give them the bugfix
too.
More information about the xorg
mailing list