[SCM TRANSITION] Re: Proposal: move Randr protocol and library to git

[Egbert Eich]

Xavier Bestel writes:
 > On Wed, 2006-04-19 at 14:47, Keith Packard wrote:
 > > On Wed, 2006-04-19 at 10:40 +0200, Egbert Eich wrote:
 > > 
 > > > Everyone whose module if interest got switched is forced to do the switch.
 > > > - and probably has to wiggle with two SCMs.
 > > 
 > > There is a big difference between using the code and modifying the code;
 > > as long as we have concensus from the modifiers, I'm less concerned
 > > about the people who are just pulling the latest revision as the
 > > learning curve there is dramatically lower (git-clone vs cvs checkout).
 > 
 > Especially now with git-cvsserver, where only 1 repository (and so 1
 > SCM) is needed.

I suspect that this will be only for reading. 
So yes, it will accomodate the users.

Cheers,
	Egbert.