[SCM TRANSITION] Re: Proposal: move Randr protocol and library to git

[Xavier Bestel]

On Wed, 2006-04-19 at 14:47, Keith Packard wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-04-19 at 10:40 +0200, Egbert Eich wrote:
> 
> > Everyone whose module if interest got switched is forced to do the switch.
> > - and probably has to wiggle with two SCMs.
> 
> There is a big difference between using the code and modifying the code;
> as long as we have concensus from the modifiers, I'm less concerned
> about the people who are just pulling the latest revision as the
> learning curve there is dramatically lower (git-clone vs cvs checkout).

Especially now with git-cvsserver, where only 1 repository (and so 1
SCM) is needed.

	Xav