[SCM TRANSITION] Re: Proposal: move Randr protocol and library to git

[Egbert Eich]

Adam Jackson writes:
 > On Tuesday 18 April 2006 13:22, Egbert Eich wrote:
 > > Roland Scheidegger writes:
 > >  > I don't really think it's important if everything is moved at once,
 > >  > however I very much agree that it would be painful if some parts moved
 > >  > to OTHER scms. If some parts stay in cvs for now that's not too bad,
 > >  > everyone knows how to use it anyway.
 > >
 > > That the number of SCMs starts to proliferate is really my main
 > > concern.
 > 
 > Anyone who tries to migrate to an SCM that is not comparably capable to git 
 > can find hosting elsewhere.  This is a short list.

Ajax, you may have had the right idea - I still dislike your wording 
which brings back bad memories of the last days of XFree86.

I'd rather see people trying to work towards a consensus (even if
the majority  just agree to what's been put on the table).

Cheers,
	Egbert.