[SCM TRANSITION] Re: Proposal: move Randr protocol and library to git
eich at suse.de
Wed Apr 19 00:24:36 PDT 2006
Adam Jackson writes:
> On Tuesday 18 April 2006 13:22, Egbert Eich wrote:
> > Roland Scheidegger writes:
> > > I don't really think it's important if everything is moved at once,
> > > however I very much agree that it would be painful if some parts moved
> > > to OTHER scms. If some parts stay in cvs for now that's not too bad,
> > > everyone knows how to use it anyway.
> > That the number of SCMs starts to proliferate is really my main
> > concern.
> Anyone who tries to migrate to an SCM that is not comparably capable to git
> can find hosting elsewhere. This is a short list.
Ajax, you may have had the right idea - I still dislike your wording
which brings back bad memories of the last days of XFree86.
I'd rather see people trying to work towards a consensus (even if
the majority just agree to what's been put on the table).
More information about the xorg