[SCM TRANSITION] Re: Proposal: move Randr protocol and library to git

[Roland Scheidegger]

Egbert Eich wrote:
> However  I feel that this should be done in one consolidated efford 
> with the clear goal in mind to have all pieces available in the same 
> SCM once the process is completed like it happend in the modularization
> effords (thanks to Kevin at al.!).
> Anything else bears the risk that the number of SCMs used on our code 
> base starts to proliferate. 
I don't really think it's important if everything is moved at once, 
however I very much agree that it would be painful if some parts moved 
to OTHER scms. If some parts stay in cvs for now that's not too bad, 
everyone knows how to use it anyway.

Roland