test intel git repo, with modesetting
Alan Hourihane
alanh at fairlite.demon.co.uk
Fri Apr 7 00:25:14 PDT 2006
On Thu, 2006-04-06 at 19:26 -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
> On Thursday 06 April 2006 18:14, Keith Packard wrote:
> > Let's ask Ajax whether he cares; the 7.1 is a katamari, so he shouldn't
> > be pulling anything but tarballs for the i810 driver. I think what we
> > need to do is figure out what we want for the 7.1 release and make sure
> > ajax has that release.
>
> Mmm, yes and no.
>
> So we can split the phases here if we want. If there's stuff that needs to go
> into the driver for 7.1, I'll defer to expert opinion about which code train
> is most appropriate. And if the maintainership for a given module wants to
> handle stabilizing it directly, that's fine too, subject to getting it
> delivered enough in advance of the release date that we can do final smoke
> testing - three days to a week, say.
>
> But if I'm handed a tarball - or more accurately, a tag - I'll still need to
> distcheck from that with the magic release fu enabled so the tarball gets
> named the right thing, and tag that instant in time as being "the 7.1
> release". The alternative is to tag and release the module on the katamari
> day itself, which is what I'll be doing for every other module anyway. It's
> about the same amount of work for me either way.
>
> I don't particularly care which repo I pull from.
>
> So I guess the answer is, if you want to stabilize and bless it yourself, you
> need to deliver earlier, and hope that the rest of the world doesn't break
> you in the final week.
Thanks for the followup ajax.
Having just the git repo, and a README in the old CVS i810 driver to say
"go get it from here...." will suffice I think.
Alan.
More information about the xorg
mailing list