glib dependency for the X Server

[Adam Jackson]

On Monday 03 April 2006 11:42, Greg Stark wrote:
> Do any of the closed X server vendors currently ship statically linked
> executables? How would they feel about having to provide linkable objects
> so the user can relink the X server with a new version of the library?

Do we really want to continue to encourage closed X?

ObCoverity: 271.

- ajax
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg/attachments/20060403/9d14aaa7/attachment.pgp>