render improvements

Owen Taylor otaylor at
Tue Apr 26 16:37:48 PDT 2005

On Tue, 2005-04-26 at 19:09 -0400, Zack Rusin wrote:
> On Tuesday 26 April 2005 17:11, Owen Taylor wrote:
> > What I did to verify was to look at the xserver diff, which is
> > smaller, and that didn't look to touch the selection of an optimized
> > path at all.
> >
> > Then I diff'ed fbpict.c between the patched version of the xserver
> > code and the patched version of the xorg code, and 'diff -uw' was
> > essentially empty, so I think if the xorg code compiles with USE_MMX,
> > it should be selecting the right version.
> You're talking about the old version. The diff for Xorg is smaller than 
> for Xserver. It barely touches fbpict at all. The new patch doesn't 
> merge the changes between xserver or xorg it just adds the new Render 
> implementation so there are differences between fbpict's in both 
> servers (oh, and yes it does compile with mmx code).

Well, the old version validates. I'd rather see that then a new version
that we have to separately merge the fbpict.c changes, but either
way works in the end.


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <>

More information about the xorg mailing list