Various missing COPYING files and licenses in xlibs module

Daniel Stone daniel at fooishbar.org
Mon Apr 18 15:16:26 PDT 2005


On Mon, Apr 18, 2005 at 08:33:43AM -0700, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
> Is anyone going to continue maintaining the old xlibs modules once
> the Xorg modular tree gets going?  Is there any reason to put in much
> more effort there?   While it was a useful expirement and is still a
> source of info for the Xorg modularization, I'm not sure I see a long-term
> purpose for it to continue - most experimentation could be done in CVS
> branches on the Xorg modular tree.

I don't see any use for it, no.  However, there's no reason to stop
working on it, since the split there is (almost?) identical to the one
being proposed for X11R7; whatever's done there now will be useful for
'the modular tree'.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg/attachments/20050419/ac9f5891/attachment.pgp>


More information about the xorg mailing list