libXau shared?

[Keith Packard]

Around 18 o'clock on Oct 12, Egbert Eich wrote:

> So far we are building libXau unshared only.
> Is there a specific reason why libXau should 
> not be a shared lib?

I strongly believe that all published libraries should be built both shared
(with PIC) and non-shared (without PIC).  I'd also like to encourage them 
to be buildable for profiling (non-shared, without PIC).

In the autotool'ed xlibs project, we use the standard libtool rules for 
library construction which does at least the first two kinds.  I don't 
know how to make it built profilable libraries.

-keith


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 228 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg/attachments/20041012/3c650b12/attachment.pgp>