Bug in module loading system on x86-64?

[Alan Cox]

On Sad, 2004-10-02 at 16:21, Stuart Anderson wrote:
> > To me that sounds like a strong motivation to just use dlloader instead.
> 
> Do we really need any more excuses? It seems that people have already
> made up their mind wether or not they have understood the implmentation
> of either of the choices.

Will it make any difference - are these in fact model rather than loader
problems ? If the modules are not built -fPIC and are small model then
they can only be loaded below about 3.95Gb.

Alan