[Xorg] New commiter process?
Charles Goodwin
charlie at vexi.org
Wed Jun 16 10:42:24 PDT 2004
On Wed, 2004-06-16 at 13:14 -0400, Sean Middleditch wrote:
> Keith very very specifically said they are *not* switching off CVS
> anytime soon. Trust me, we've heard the same "CVS sucks" argument over,
> and over, and over, and over. Likewise, we've heard the "this is why
> SCM [foo] rules so much" argument for every SCM in existence way more
> times than is necessary. We all know everything there is to know about
> Subversion, Darcs, Bitkeeper, GNU Arch, etc. (Most of us are bright
> enough to use one of those for our own projects. ~,^ )
No apology necessary and, well, of course you guys know about 'em. It
was a bit patronising of me to assume otherwise. Sorry! ;)
> Xorg isn't switching anytime soon though for purely logistic reasons,
The rebuttal to that would be that a distributed SCM tool is better
"logistically" than CVS, but sheesh some say Emacs is better than Vi.
> so the argument is completely pointless. Sorry.
Oh well. "Nice try" me. Back to lurker mode...
--
- Charlie
Charles Goodwin <charlie at vexi.org>
Online @ www.charlietech.com
More information about the xorg
mailing list