[Xorg] Re: DRI fixes for libdl module loader
ajax at nwnk.net
Fri Jul 23 10:49:19 PDT 2004
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On Friday 23 July 2004 11:40, Jakub Stachowski wrote:
> I suggest doing more radical changes, like link-time dependencies, getting
> rid of LoadSubModule() and init/cleanup functions in debrix (perhaps in
> separate branch). As it is not mature yet and still needs some time and
> work, no one would suffer from this - regular user would use 'stable' Xorg
> tree as usual and developers would have time to get used to changes and see
> how it works in reality.
That's a good idea.
My original point is pretty much moot now, the most recent patch in #377 lets
you load any of the permutations (glx and dri in either order, glx only, dri
only, or neither) with reasonable behaviour - or at least the same behaviour
as the old loader. As it turns out, libdri without libglx will never touch
any of the glx-dependent code in libdri, because the app won't be able to
create a GL context.
- - ajax
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the xorg