kdrive and xgl DDXes

Daniel Stone daniel at fooishbar.org
Fri Jun 24 01:01:10 PDT 2005


On Fri, Jun 24, 2005 at 09:18:58AM +1000, Dave Airlie wrote:
> > With m12n, don't contrib modules become irrelevant?  Either something's
> > part of the release, or it's not, in which case putting it somewhere
> > else doesn't really buy you much.
> 
> Bot when you are doing a 6.9 must equal 7.0 for everything, then you
> can provide 7.0 contrib modules that aren't in 6.x but work perfectly
> alongside 7.0 for distros to distribute if they want...
> 
> So they can be blessed for use with 7.0 modules that aren't in 6.9 or 7.0....

I just don't see why we should go to the effort of saying 'these modules
work with 7.0, as well as a whole raft of other modules that also work
with 7.0 but we aren't advertising those; also, we aren't supporting
these and they aren't part of the release, really'.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-modular/attachments/20050624/3c8a681d/attachment.pgp


More information about the xorg-modular mailing list