SCM choices for the server (was Re: kdrive and xgl DDXes)

[Daniel Stone]

On Wed, Jun 22, 2005 at 02:51:50PM -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
> So the next question is how we want server development to look in the future, 
> and tied up in that decision is our choice of SCM.  I think if we stay with 
> CVS for the release server, then we definitely need a separate tree for 
> experimental, which means the joy of syncing.  I suspect no one wants to use 
> CVS more than necessary though.

I still like Arch, from a personal point of view, but it's just not
ready at the moment.  That being said, neither is Darcs or Monotone.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-modular/attachments/20050623/f9aae159/attachment.pgp