kdrive and xgl DDXes

[Adam Jackson]

On Wednesday 22 June 2005 12:28, Daniel Stone wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 22, 2005 at 12:19:37PM -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
> > - Slaves kdrive and xgl development to the 7.0 schedule
>
> Eh, not necessarily.  That's what branches are for, no?

True.

> > There's always the possibility of marking those DDXes highly experimental
> > and not building them by default in the official 7.0 release (though
> > possibly by default in the release candidates for coverage).  Or just
> > doing a really rapid 7.0.1 right after 7.0 that imports the other two.
>
> Why should we do this in a bugfix release?  I thought .x.x releases were
> meant to be for bug fixes, not features ...

Well we haven't decided on module numbering for post-7.0 at all, have we?

- ajax
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-modular/attachments/20050622/99c93a28/attachment.pgp