[PATCH] autoshit/libfool fixes

Daniel Stone daniel at fooishbar.org
Mon Jun 13 03:01:17 PDT 2005


On Mon, Jun 13, 2005 at 11:30:34AM +0200, Enrico Weigelt wrote:
> * Daniel Stone <daniel at fooishbar.org> wrote:
> > So it's a chroot with a cross-compiler.  
> 
> Not really. 
> 
> In a chroot environment, the whole toolchain runs inside the chroot. 
> And of course target and host system have to be the same. 
> 
> A sysroot environment is different from that: it just takes all 
> files to import (ie. libs, includes, etc) are taken from the 
> sysroot. The toolchain itself runs directly in the host system.
> It does not matter here, whether host and target are the same
> or completely different.

Sounds like a pretty odd use case.  Why don't you either use a chroot,
or just not have conflicting libraries installed?  I don't see why we
should apply some random weird patch to libtool for something as
incredibly marginal as this (certainly not a 'common headache').
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-modular/attachments/20050613/cc23df53/attachment.pgp


More information about the xorg-modular mailing list