Modularization development notes [was Re: RFA sent to the ArchWG]

[Keith Packard]

On Thu, 2005-04-14 at 17:21 -0400, Kevin E Martin wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 14, 2005 at 01:54:07PM -0700, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
> > Kevin E Martin wrote:
> > >> - xc/programs/cxpm
> > >>  - xc/programs/sxpm
> > 
> > Would these return to being part of the libXpm module, as
> > they were before XFree86 pulled the XPM package into extras?
> 
> That sounds like a good idea.
> 
> Should we remove Xpm from the lib module as well and just include it
> from the upstream source as a tarball?  Also, who is the upstream
> maintainer?  It seems we've applied quite a few fixes but I wonder how
> many of them have been pushed back upstream.

I believe we are now the 'upstream maintainer' for Xpm...

-keith

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-modular/attachments/20050414/71412ccd/attachment.pgp