Modularization development notes [was Re: RFA sent to the ArchWG]

[Daniel Stone]

On Thu, Apr 14, 2005 at 05:21:20PM -0400, Kevin E Martin wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 14, 2005 at 01:54:07PM -0700, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
> > Kevin E Martin wrote:
> > >> - xc/programs/cxpm
> > >>  - xc/programs/sxpm
> > 
> > Would these return to being part of the libXpm module, as
> > they were before XFree86 pulled the XPM package into extras?
> 
> That sounds like a good idea.
> 
> Should we remove Xpm from the lib module as well and just include it
> from the upstream source as a tarball?  Also, who is the upstream
> maintainer?  It seems we've applied quite a few fixes but I wonder how
> many of them have been pushed back upstream.

Groupe Bull (or, rather, GROUPE BULL, or just Bull, these days), seem
distinctly uninterested in maintaining it; we're upstream by default.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-modular/attachments/20050415/b34b6404/attachment.pgp