[PATCH util/macros] Add new script xorg-prepare-git-repo.sh

[Emil Velikov]

On 2 February 2017 at 22:04, Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer at who-t.net> wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 10:24:55AM +0000, Emil Velikov wrote:
>> From: Emil Velikov <emil.velikov at collabora.com>
>>
>> New script invoked by the project's autogen.sh to facilitate basic git
>> config setup and likely others in the future.
>>
>> Ensure that all of output is redirected to /dev/null and the script is
>> bundled + installed.
>>
>> Cc: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer at who-t.net>
>> Signed-off-by: Emil Velikov <emil.velikov at collabora.com>
>> ---
>>  Makefile.am              | 1 +
>>  xorg-prepare-git-repo.sh | 7 +++++++
>>  2 files changed, 8 insertions(+)
>>  create mode 100644 xorg-prepare-git-repo.sh
>>
>> diff --git a/Makefile.am b/Makefile.am
>> index 134a5cc..ff6087a 100644
>> --- a/Makefile.am
>> +++ b/Makefile.am
>> @@ -21,6 +21,7 @@
>>
>>  aclocaldir = $(datadir)/aclocal
>>  aclocal_DATA = xorg-macros.m4
>> +dist_bin_SCRIPTS = xorg-prepare-git-repo.sh
>>  dist_pkgdata_DATA = INSTALL
>>
>>  # Previous versions used to install xorgversion.m4, now integrated
>> diff --git a/xorg-prepare-git-repo.sh b/xorg-prepare-git-repo.sh
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000..697cee9
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/xorg-prepare-git-repo.sh
>> @@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
>> +#!/bin/sh
>> +
>> +git config --local --get sendemail.to >/dev/null 2>&1 ||
>> +    git config --local sendemail.to "xorg-devel at lists.x.org" >/dev/null 2>&1
>> +
>> +git config --local --get format.subjectPrefix >/dev/null 2>&1 ||
>> +    git config --local format.subjectPrefix "PATCH $modulename" >/dev/null 2>&1
>
> we're going to have to agree on a module name format *now* before we push
> these to the various repos. Either we go with the split of section +
> modulename or we go with module name as "section/modulename", including the
> section being omitted. But this is something that's painful to change, so
> let's decide on something and live with it.
>
> I'd say "section/modulename", any disagreement? If not, I can push this one
> as-is with a comment in the script to note what $modulename is supposed to
> look like.
>
As long as you guys are happy, I'm fine either way.

-Emil