[RFC] Automatic modifier update of slave devices

[Keith Packard]

Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer at who-t.net> writes:

> the less-intrusive alternative would be to force only the indicator state
> down to the slaves. won't change keyboard behaviour as seen by the client
> and still has the effect that most people expect from their keyboards.
> comments?

That seems even weirder to me -- you've got a NumLock light on, and yet
your keyboard doesn't have NumLock pressed when seen as a slave?

-- 
keith.packard at intel.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 810 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel/attachments/20140224/72b7e7a1/attachment.pgp>