glamor versus AIGLX GL context series

[Eric Anholt]

Michel Dänzer <michel at daenzer.net> writes:

> On 22.04.2014 04:08, Eric Anholt wrote:
>> I think the must-do items for glamor in 1.16 will be done.
>
> As I mentioned before, there's also at least one fix for a memory leak
> in copy_n_to_n that needs to be ported from the standalone glamor tree,
> if Keith's copy_n_to_n rework doesn't go into 1.16. There may be more
> fixes to be ported from there; are you planning to take a look at that,
> or should I?

It wasn't on my list.  I'll try and take a look, but testing and sending
the patch would be a more reliable way to make it happen.

> BTW, the 'glamor: Add glamor_transfer based glamor_get_image and
> glamor_put_image' commit in your glamor-fixes branch still breaks the
> libreoffice icons for me. Are you guys seeing that as well?

Nope, don't see that here.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 818 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel/attachments/20140422/84f1f754/attachment.sig>