xorg-server-1.14.1.902 - build error

Matt Dew marcoz at osource.org
Wed Sep 4 12:49:22 PDT 2013


On 09/03/2013 11:45 PM, Peter Hutterer wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 03, 2013 at 10:35:56AM -0600, Matt Dew wrote:
>> Ping?
>
> I've merged this into my tree now, will be in the next pull request
>
> Cheers,
>     Peter

Thanks Peter.
   Any idea when that pull request will be?  xserver 1.14.3 has been a
mess schedule wise.  I'd like to get it out so I can get back onto a
6-week schedule again but I'd like to get this one in .3 instead of
waiting for .4 just so we can be done with it.

   If that pull request'll be this week, I'll wait until next Thursday
before releasing  1.13.4 otherwise I'll just pop out 1.13.4 tomorrow.

Unless anyone has objections to this plan,
Matt









>
>
>> On 08/26/2013 03:06 PM, Matt Dew wrote:
>>> Keith,
>>>    I saw you did a R-b back on Jun 21, did that make it into trunk that I
>>> can cherry-pick?
>>>
>>> thanks,
>>> Matt
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 2:00 AM, Chris Clayton <chris2553 at gmail.com
>>> <mailto:chris2553 at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>
>>>      Hi Matt.
>>>
>>>
>>>      On 06/27/13 02:46, Matt Dew wrote:
>>>
>>>          On 06/26/2013 01:20 AM, Chris Clayton wrote:
>>>
>>>      [snip]
>>>
>>>
>>>              I see that 1.14.2 has been released without any of the above
>>>              happening.
>>>              That's no big deal, but Matt's statement in the release
>>>              notice "that
>>>              this release doesn't work with gcc 4.8-snapshot" is a bit
>>>              misleading. As
>>>              I reported, it won't *build* with gcc-4.8 snapshot. Once my
>>>              patch is
>>>              applied, it builds fine and, from my experience over the
>>>              last two weeks,
>>>              it works fine too.
>>>
>>>
>>>          Hi Chris,
>>>              I didn't feel there was enough time to properly bake that
>>>          patch so I
>>>          didn't include it in 1.14.2.
>>>
>>>
>>>       From a quick look at the source, I see that my patch has not been
>>>      applied yet. Like the 1.14.2 release candidates, 1.14.2.902 does not
>>>      build without it when the compiler is a recent 4.8 gcc release.
>>>
>>>      Chris
>>>
>>>
>>>               It wasn't my intent to be misleading but to me, in this
>>>          regard, 'not
>>>          building' is the same as 'doesn't work'.
>>>
>>>          Matt
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>              Chris
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> xorg-devel at lists.x.org: X.Org development
>> Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel
>> Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
>>


More information about the xorg-devel mailing list