xorg-server-1.14.1.902 - build error
Peter Hutterer
peter.hutterer at who-t.net
Tue Sep 3 22:45:06 PDT 2013
On Tue, Sep 03, 2013 at 10:35:56AM -0600, Matt Dew wrote:
> Ping?
I've merged this into my tree now, will be in the next pull request
Cheers,
Peter
> On 08/26/2013 03:06 PM, Matt Dew wrote:
> > Keith,
> > I saw you did a R-b back on Jun 21, did that make it into trunk that I
> > can cherry-pick?
> >
> > thanks,
> > Matt
> >
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 2:00 AM, Chris Clayton <chris2553 at gmail.com
> > <mailto:chris2553 at gmail.com>> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Matt.
> >
> >
> > On 06/27/13 02:46, Matt Dew wrote:
> >
> > On 06/26/2013 01:20 AM, Chris Clayton wrote:
> >
> > [snip]
> >
> >
> > I see that 1.14.2 has been released without any of the above
> > happening.
> > That's no big deal, but Matt's statement in the release
> > notice "that
> > this release doesn't work with gcc 4.8-snapshot" is a bit
> > misleading. As
> > I reported, it won't *build* with gcc-4.8 snapshot. Once my
> > patch is
> > applied, it builds fine and, from my experience over the
> > last two weeks,
> > it works fine too.
> >
> >
> > Hi Chris,
> > I didn't feel there was enough time to properly bake that
> > patch so I
> > didn't include it in 1.14.2.
> >
> >
> > From a quick look at the source, I see that my patch has not been
> > applied yet. Like the 1.14.2 release candidates, 1.14.2.902 does not
> > build without it when the compiler is a recent 4.8 gcc release.
> >
> > Chris
> >
> >
> > It wasn't my intent to be misleading but to me, in this
> > regard, 'not
> > building' is the same as 'doesn't work'.
> >
> > Matt
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Chris
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________
> xorg-devel at lists.x.org: X.Org development
> Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel
> Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
>
More information about the xorg-devel
mailing list