Initial DRI3000 protocol specs available

[Daniel Stone]

Hi,

On 7 March 2013 17:17, Keith Packard <keithp at keithp.com> wrote:

> James Jones <jajones at nvidia.com> writes:
>
> > There didn't seem to be much interest outside of NVIDIA, so
> > besides fence sync, the ideas are tabled internally ATM.
>
> This shouldn't surprise you though -- no-one else needs this kind of
> synchronization, so it's really hard for anyone to evaluate it. And,
> DRI2 offers 'sufficient' support for the various GL sync extensions.
>

At least for TEXTURE_2D, sure.  TEXTURE_EXTERNAL still requires
synchronisation (i.e. fences) beyond 'just smash some commands at the
kernel and flush on context switches and we're all good'.

Cheers,
Daniel
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel/attachments/20130308/839b2a24/attachment.html>